America proposed 13.6 GW of new nuclear power in one week
Four plans, from a 1 MW reactor for the US Navy to a six-reactor site in Kentucky. None of them is built or licensed, and none has a final go-ahead.
Between Monday and Thursday, four separate plans for new nuclear power in the US were made public. Add them up and they come to about 13.6 GW. That is more than three times the 4.2 GW fleet of small reactors one group is planning for the UK.
The biggest is in Kentucky. The Nuclear Company wants up to six Westinghouse AP1000 reactors in Lewis County, 6.6 GW in total. Two would come first, with construction targeted to start in 2028. In Indiana, the state, the utility Hoosier Energy and the Canadian firm AtkinsRéalis signed a memorandum of understanding. That is an agreement to explore, not a contract. It covers up to eight Candu reactors, 6 GW combined. Candu reactors run on natural uranium and use heavy water.
The other two are smaller. The US utility AEP, reactor designer X-energy and Amazon are studying 12 of X-energy's Xe-100 reactors at a former coal plant site in Sullivan County, Indiana. Each makes 80 MW of electricity, so 960 MW in all. The Xe-100 is cooled by gas, and its fuel comes as small balls called pebbles. And the US Navy picked Radiant's Kaleidos for Naval Weapons Station Crane, also in Indiana. It is a 1 MW reactor, built in a factory and designed to be moved. Radiant says it can run for up to five years before refuelling.
None of this is certain yet. The Kentucky plan has no published cost or licence. The Indiana Candu agreement commits nobody. The Amazon project still needs a final investment decision. Even the Navy's reactor still needs design work, testing, an environmental review and regulatory sign-off.
Why it matters to youBefore any reactor is built, someone has to survey the site, test the ground and write the safety case. The Kentucky team says that site and ground investigation comes first. That early civil and licensing work is where a lot of nuclear careers start.